Former CIA Director speaks on Global Jihad

The CIA Director, James Woolsey, is speaking up about the war that has engaged us by the Islamic proponents of spreading Shariah Law world wide... whether we like it or not.

World Net Daily

Former CIA chief warns: U.S. 'at war' with Shariah... Tells CPAC it's not 'Islamophobic' to resist spread of Muslim law

Robert James Woolsey, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency, told a break-out session of the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., that America needs to stop being so politically correct and realize it is "at war" with those who would spread Islamic, or Shariah, law.

"We have to understand that we are in a war here – certainly with the terrorists; certainly with Al Qaida; certainly with Hamas and Hezbollah," Woolsey said. "We're also at war, with no choice of our own, with those who want to, over the long run, impose Shariah [Islamic law] upon us.

"And it is one of the toughest fights we have ever had or will have," he continued, "because Americans are used to religious liberty and not criticizing one another's religions."
...
Among other things, Dr. Woolsey declared there is currently:

* "The establishing of a world-wide caliphate-theocratic dictatorship of the world; entirely imposed to democracy … terribly oppressive to women in every possible way, from sanctioning their being beaten by their husbands to girls being killed by their fathers if they walk on the street with a neighbor boy who is not a member of the family; death to homosexuals and apostates and on and on and on. And ultimately, that is the goal of Shariah. And it is the goal for the Muslim Brotherhood, which is doing its best to implement that over the long run."

* "The Brotherhood practices takia, or lying to infidels with grace and ease."

* "A so-called explanatory memorandum by Mohamed Akram, the senior Hamas and Brotherhood leader in 1991 in the United States. He explained that what they are doing is a so-called 'settlement process' to establish themselves inside the U.S. Once established to undertake a 'grand jihad' characterized as a 'civilization jihad,' and specifically, the settlement process is to 'eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within and sabotage its miserable house by their hands and hands of believers so that it is eliminated.'"

* "We are, with the Muslim Brotherhood and the drive for jihad, looking at something that is roughly parallel to the efforts of the communists in the 1950s and '60s."

Woolsey further addressed the common refrain that criticism Shariah in the U.S. is based on an irrational fear of Islam, sometimes called "Islamophobia":

"When a totalitarian government grows out of a religion as, let's say the Spanish Inquisition grew out of one aspect of Catholicism, you are not being a 'Christianphobe' if you criticize burning Jews and Muslims and dissident Christians at the stake," Woolsey explained. "And if you're opposed to Shariah and the beating of women and killing of apostates, you are not an 'Islamophobe.'"

Jingle Bells - The Bethlehem 2010 Version

Temporary Wife... Legal Prostitute

A "Temporary Wife" is hanged in Iran for killing the "Permanent Wife" of an Iranian soccer player.

Do you know what a "Temporary Wife" is?

FOX news report

Iran Hangs Former Soccer Player's Mistress

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran on Wednesday hanged a former soccer player's mistress — known as a "temporary wife" — who was convicted of murdering her love rival in a case that captivated the Iranian public for several years....

Jahed had become what is known as a "temporary wife" of former soccer star Nasser Mohammad Khani. She was charged in 2002 with stabbing his wife, Laleh Saharkhizan, to death and convicted of murder in 2004 and again in 2009, after her appeal was denied.

Contracts with "temporary wives" are a legal way for Iranian men to have mistresses outside marriage, with the agreements lasting from between several hours to a few years.....

Under Iranian law, men and women can commit to a "temporary marriage" for an agreed period of time after a certain amount of money is paid to the woman.

In Iran, men are allowed up to four legal wives under Islam and any number of temporary wives. Women can only be married to one man at a time....

Doesn't the "Temporary Wife" sound a little like a prostitute to you? Also, Iranian men can already have up to 4 wives besides their religious leaders finding ways for them to have their little side flings with their legal "Temporary Wives."

Do you think for one second that an Iranian woman can have more than 1 husband... or hire a "Temporary Husband" for an hour on top of her 4 legal husbands?

Friends... this is the kind of ideologues that want to take over our nation.

So... this is what we want in "multiculturalism?"

What we have is a clash of cultures going on in the Western World and multiculturalism is a pipe-dream for either the uninformed... or the dry powder in the breech of the revolutionary's cannon.

It is time to wake up.

xtnyoda, shalomed

H/T Jeremy

Yesterday I posted about Oklahoma voters passing a measure that said that in Oklahoma there will be no room for judges or courts to consider Sharia Muslim law in Oklahoma courtrooms. I also mentioned that there were sure to be lawsuits to try and stop the overwhelmingly passed initiative, 70% passage vote to be a little more exact.

It took all of 2 days for the lawsuit to be filed.

AP Yahoo news

Lawsuit filed in Okla. against Islamic law ban

OKLAHOMA CITY – An Oklahoma Muslim filed a federal lawsuit on Thursday to block a state constitutional amendment overwhelmingly approved by voters that would prohibit state courts from considering international law or Islamic law when deciding cases.

The measure, which got 70 percent of the vote in Tuesday's election, was one of several on Oklahoma's ballot that critics said pandered to conservatives and would move the state further to the right.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Oklahoma City, seeks a temporary retraining order and injunction to block the election results from being certified by the state Election Board on Nov. 9. Among other things, the lawsuit alleges the ballot measure transforms Oklahoma's Constitution into "an enduring condemnation" of Islam by singling it out for special restrictions by barring Islamic law, also known as Sharia law.

"We have a handful of politicians who have pushed an amendment onto our state ballot and then conducted a well-planned and well-funded campaign of misinformation and fear," said Muneer Awad, who filed the suit and is executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Oklahoma. "We have certain unalienable rights, and those rights cannot be taken away from me by a political campaign."....

So... Muneer... you claim the "unalienable right" to keep the door open for Sharia law? Now... I thought your cohorts said that there was going to be no move to institute Sharia law? So... what are you complaining about?

Make no mistake... the goal of establishing Sharia is at the very core of the Muslim effort to take over America.

We are not stupid.

xtnyoda, shalomed

The "progressives" are having a fit over Oklahomans passing a state law that outlaws the application of Sharia Islamic law in the state of Oklahoma.

The "progressives" want to paint all Oklahomans as hick idiots... even though it is the express intention of Islamists to institute Islam by implementing Sharia law in lands they are conquering... and instituting Sharia law is exactly their weapon of assault.

So... the "progressives" are claiming as idiots the very people who are trying to save their lives... because as soon as Sharia law is established the "progressives" would be the very first ones whose heads would be loped of by some Sharia court with the charge of being an infidel.

Think Progressive

Sharia Hysteria Comes To Oklahoma: Voters Approve Sharia Law Ban

Oklahoma became the first U.S. state to ban the non-existent threat of Sharia law yesterday. Nearly 70 percent of voters there approved ballot initiative “Question 755″ — or the “Save Our State” constitutional amendment — which bans Sharia from being considered in Oklahoma courts. The ballot states that Oklahoma courts must “rely on federal and state law when deciding cases” and forbids them from “considering or using international law” and “from considering or using Sharia Law.”

The measure’s sponsor, Republican state senator Rex Duncan, called the result a “preemptive strike” against local judges whom he thinks might be “legislating from the bench or using international law or Sharia law.” “The fact that Sharia law was even considered anywhere in the United States is enough for me,” said GOP state senator Anthony Sykes. “It should scare anyone that any judge in America would consider using that as precedent.” Sykes is referring to a case in New Jersey in which a local judge ruled against a woman seeking a retraining order against her husband because he had repeatedly raped her. The judge said the husband was abiding by Muslim beliefs, but the decision was later overturned by an appellate court.

One local Muslim leader called the measure a “scare tactic” while another, Saleem Quraishi, called the measure “fear mongering“:

“It’s just fear mongering; it’s nothing,” Quraishi told CNN. “What’s Sharia law have to do with Oklahoma?” [...]

Quraishi insists that Islam does not allow for men to mistreat women, and that the New Jersey case involved a “crazy, loony man, unfortunately a Muslim.” “That is not Islam,” he said. “Oklahoma, you know, is a very Republican state,” Quraishi said. He accused some lawmakers with attempting to instill fear in the heads of constituents in order to drum up votes. “But Oklahomans are not like that. I know most of the Oklahomans. They’re very nice people.”

Of course, in the quote above by Saleem Quraishi, stating that the law is crazy... with the additional threat of a law suit to repeal it in federal court.... Saleem... by his pitiful denial that there is a problem... acknowledges the problem... for if it wasn't his and Muslims intentions to conquer through Sharai law... then he shouldn't have a problem with the new law itself.

So... Saleem's "defense" is in and of itself an acknowledgment of guilt itself.

xtnyoda, shalomed