The LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered) get an official endorsement (with tax money and federal benefits attached) from the White House...
...but... fret not... the White House won't yet endorse normal people having sex together outside of marriage.
Questions... How is the all wise federal government to know which "same-sexed" partner is actually partnering with whom? Will same-sexed partners now have to "register" with the federal government to receive our tax support? What about when the said "same-sexed" partners decide to... separate... will they be required to register their separation with the federal government so that the federal government can stop giving benefits to separated "same-sexed" former partners?
What about bi-sexuals and their multiple partners? What if a bi-sexual man is partnering with a woman and another man, (implicit in the term 'bi-sexual') do all three get benefits?
I could go on but you get the idea... and the discussion gets... strange... after a while.
washington post article
...."This is the next step of what hopefully will be many steps in moving toward equal rights for LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] people in this country," Hirsch said, before going to the White House, where he was invited to witness the signing.
Hirsch wants job-related relocation expenses within the United States to be covered for partners, but that will have to wait for the broader review of polices Obama ordered. "Currently most agencies will not pay for the partner," Hirsch said. "They will pay for your pet, but they will not pay for your life partner."
The presidential memorandum does not cover domestic heterosexual partners because they have the option to marry, Berry said in an interview....
...but... fret not... the White House won't yet endorse normal people having sex together outside of marriage.
Questions... How is the all wise federal government to know which "same-sexed" partner is actually partnering with whom? Will same-sexed partners now have to "register" with the federal government to receive our tax support? What about when the said "same-sexed" partners decide to... separate... will they be required to register their separation with the federal government so that the federal government can stop giving benefits to separated "same-sexed" former partners?
What about bi-sexuals and their multiple partners? What if a bi-sexual man is partnering with a woman and another man, (implicit in the term 'bi-sexual') do all three get benefits?
I could go on but you get the idea... and the discussion gets... strange... after a while.
washington post article
...."This is the next step of what hopefully will be many steps in moving toward equal rights for LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] people in this country," Hirsch said, before going to the White House, where he was invited to witness the signing.
Hirsch wants job-related relocation expenses within the United States to be covered for partners, but that will have to wait for the broader review of polices Obama ordered. "Currently most agencies will not pay for the partner," Hirsch said. "They will pay for your pet, but they will not pay for your life partner."
The presidential memorandum does not cover domestic heterosexual partners because they have the option to marry, Berry said in an interview....
posted by XtnYoda at 7:48 AM
1 Comments:
Likewise as it was also in the days of Lot: They ate, they drank, they bought,they sold, they planted, they built; but on the day that Lot, went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even so will it be in the day when the Son of Man is revealed. Luke 17:28-30
Looking back at Lot and Sodom it was militant homosexuality and blantant rebellion against God. I am not saying when he is coming but it is getting awful close.
Post a Comment
<< Home